Risk of pocket hematoma in patients on chronic anticoagulation with warfarin undergoing electrophysiological device implantation: a comparison of different peri-operative management strategies.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVE Periprocedural management of warfarin remains challenging in patients requiring electrophysiological device surgery. For patients at high risk of thromboembolic events, guidelines recommend bridging therapy with heparin; however, this strategy is associated with a high risk of pocket hematoma. This paper systematically reviews studies appraising the risk of pocket hematoma with different perioperative anticoagulation strategies. METHODS All relevant studies identified in MEDLINE/PubMed, The Cochrane Collaboration CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.org and in bibliographies of key articles. Estimates were combined using a fixed effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by p values of χ2 statistics and I2. Publication bias was assessed by visual examination of funnel plots and by Egger test. Fifteen studies enrolling 5911 patients met all inclusion criteria and were included in this review. RESULTS Heparin bridging compared with no heparin was associated with increased risk of pocket hematoma (OR = 4.47, 95% CI 3.21-6.23, p < 0.00001), and prolonged hospital stay (9.13 ± 1.9 days vs. 5.11 ± 1 .39 days, p < 0.00001). Warfarin continuation was not associated with increased pocket hematoma compared to warfarin discontinuation (p = 0.38), but was associated with reduced risk of pocket hematoma compared with heparin bridging (OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.2-0.69, p = 0.002). Thromboembolic complications were reduced with heparin bridging vs. no heparin (0.50% vs.1.07%, p = 0.02), and no significant differences were reported between heparin bridging vs. warfarin continuation (p = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS Heparin bridging is associated with a higher risk of pocket hematoma and a prolonged hospital stay. Perioperative continuation of warfarin reduces the occurrence of pocket hematoma compared with heparin bridging without any significant differences in thromboembolic complications.
منابع مشابه
Risk factors of pocket hematoma in patients with electrophysiological device implantation.
We have read the article of Proietti et al, entitled “Risk of pocket hematoma in patients on chronic anticoagulation with warfarin undergoing electrophysiological device implantation: a comparison of different peri-operative management strategie” with great interest1. The authors have evaluated the relation between periprocedural anticoagulation regimen with the risk of developing pocket hemato...
متن کاملSafety of anticoagulation with uninterrupted warfarin vs. interrupted dabigatran in patients requiring an implantable cardiac device.
BACKGROUND The optimal strategy of peri-procedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing permanent cardiac device implantation is controversial. Our objective was to compare the major bleeding and thromboembolic complications in patients managed with uninterrupted warfarin (UW) vs. interrupted dabigatran (ID) during permanent pacemaker (PPM) or implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) imp...
متن کاملAnticoagulation management of patients with long-term warfarin therapy after valve replacement during the perioperative period of pacemaker implantation.
BACKGROUND To explore an optimal management of perioperative anticoagulation for patients with long-term warfarin therapy after valve replacement during the perioperative of pacemaker implantation. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients undergoing pacemaker implantation who received long-term warfarin therapy after valve replacements at our hospital. They were divided into 3...
متن کاملPerioperative anticoagulation in patients having implantation of a cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator: a systematic review and practical management guide.
BACKGROUND The perioperative management of anticoagulation in patients who are having implantation of a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is a common clinical problem in which best clinical practise is not established. METHODS We performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the safety (pocket hematoma risk) and efficacy (thromboembolism risk) of different ...
متن کاملContinue or withhold oral anticoagulation in high-risk patients undergoing pacemaker or ICD implantation.
Tolosana et al. have reported the results of a randomized study, which compared two procedures in preparation for implantation of pacemakers or cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in a small population of chronically anticoagulated patients at high risk of thrombo-embolic events. One group was randomly assigned to continued oral anticoagulation (OAC) reduced to a target international normalized ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- European review for medical and pharmacological sciences
دوره 19 8 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015